Comparison of Signal-to-Noise, Blank Determination, and Linear Regression Methods for the Estimation of Detection and Quantification Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography

Publons ID4140058
Wos IDWOS:000273591600027
Doi
TitleComparison of Signal-to-Noise, Blank Determination, and Linear Regression Methods for the Estimation of Detection and Quantification Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography
First Author
Last Author
AuthorsSanagi, MM; Ling, SL; Nasir, Z; Hermawan, D; Ibrahim, WAW; Abu Naim, A;
Publish DateNOV-DEC 2009
Journal NameJOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Citation96
AbstractLOD and LOQ are two important performance characteristics in method validation. This work compares three methods based on the International Conference on Harmonization and EURACHEM guidelines, namely, signal-to-noise, blank determination, and linear regression, to estimate the LOD and LOQ for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by experimental methodology using GC. Five VOCs, toluene, ethylbenzene, isopropyl benzene, n-propylbenzene, and styrene, were chosen for the experimental study. The results indicated that the estimated LODs and LOQs were not equivalent and could vary by a factor of 5 to 6 for the different methods. It is, therefore, essential to have a clearly described procedure for estimating the LOD and LOQ during method validation to allow interlaboratory comparisons.
Publish TypeJournal
Publish Year2009
Page Begin1833
Page End1838
Issn1060-3271
Eissn1944-7922
Urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000273591600027
AuthorDADAN HERMAWAN, S.Si, M.Si, Ph.D
File55695.pdf